Who thinks the mod being reported for abuse cannot lock the thread concerning them. Just saw it happen with @MetaMonkeyz even tho I do believe he is a hacker, just thought if it was a real abooz then the victim would need a say without being shut down by the rouge mod.
First off the "abuse" report against fuzzy was made by a "hacker" I was supposed to jail.. but since factions didn't have jail set up at that time, I couldn't properly punish the player. So fuzzy stepped in and punished him/her for me, when I wasn't online to do so. So yes that abuse report isn't abuse at all.. hes just trying to get fuzzy demoted even after being caught hacking several times by both me and fuzzy he technically doesn't even deserve a jail, more a ban seeing how he continuously hacked.. first fuzzy punished and then he gets punished again for hacking..and now I saw him hacking as well but only kicked him because like I said jail wasn't correctly set up at that specific time Mods can lock abuse reports concerning themselves if its invalid.. unless it has some proof like rev said, mods can do whatever they feel like doing to that thread as long as it doesn't have any proof of the abuse report because it wouldn't even be considered a valid report.. seeing that they failed to follow the format and add proof of the so called "abuse"
Ffs. The dude hacked. Kill Aura, No kb. I rightfully punished him multiple times with what perms I had since no tempban. The dude had no format at all, and no proof. How about you be less ignorant of a person and stop making these pointless threads. "TheTench" was a known hacker back around july 2015, vip rank on mcmmo. Was banned at that tine due to being caught hacking. http://squadcraft.net/threads/froggy-ig-farm-raid.15877/#post-202430 Look at the screenshot in the post. He has a nexus hack client.
Here's what's going on here: Lookcook's idea is not that meta abuses, but one that mods shouldn't be able to lock abuse threads concerning themselves. This point, however, is incorrect. Mods are able and should be able to lock abuse reports concerning themselves if the thread is a hacker who has clearly been hacking. Now this brings us on to the idea of trust. Should we trust the staff team enough to trust them to truthfully lock abuse threads themselves? Meta, has done the correct thing in the situation. He's considered the report looked at the player and denied it based on the fact that he hacked. I think most of you would trust that he did the right thing. And even if he didn't, there are still all the other mods who can unlock the thread if they consider those actions to be nessecary. In this situation, meta has based his denial on the fact that: The player hacked; the player supplied no evidence; the player did not correctly follow the format. For future references, us mods should be able to lock abuse reports ourselves if it is an invalid report. If it's a valid one it should remain untouched until dealt with.
If a report is locked by the person accused and it is a valid thread then really it just confirms the report
Lol like 100 messages in the staff chat cuz of this Ignore the first bits (copied too much) and it's still going strong in the Skype group
I find it funny just seeing how much hackers rage about being banned. They hack and they know they get banned yet they cry when they do. Your own fkin fault. Go cry to surge, he might give u some sypathy
Its not that. Its when hackers report mods for banning them for hacking then they go on forums to report for abuse not trying to make shyt worse. U may have miss interpretated what this was meant to say. Like me to explain what i mean. Never said u were Ehy is everyone taking what i said the weong way :/ If u want me to explain what i mean i can Clearly confused people.
